Final Project Report Continued: Why and What next? Reflection on the semester. Compare your original project intent to what you ended up with. How did the public react? What did you learn from your project, and from the class? What will you do next with the project? What do you wish you had done differently?

With the bike built, there are some things that remain to be known, and some things I would outright have done differently. From an aesthetic perspective, I could have brazed cleaner. I think that having a larger tip would have helped on the big stuff and a smaller tip on the small stuff, but ultimately, I think I could have practiced my heat control more before I started. Also, the use of a paste flux would have helped control the run a lot.

The epoxy I used to join carbon to steel was an opaque white, and while it was not highly visible at first, its presence is exaggerated by the clear coat. Some of the joints look milky white. This should have been sanded first. Secondly, the clear coat did not go on as smooth as I had hoped. It will either have to be powder coated to sprayed on next time.

All in all, I’m glad I made a lugged carbon frame, but future practice will probably be plain steel.

Another hard lesson what that I originally wanted to do the chain stay yoke out of bent steel. I probably figured out how to bend steel a few days ago only. Too late!

When it comes to geometry, I pretty much go exactly what I wanted. Unfortunately, what I wanted was a little misinformed. The mountain bikes I based my suspension geometry on have their geometry measured without suspension preload. I based my bike, which doesn’t have suspension, on the resting geometry of these bikes. I should have added a degree to head tube angle to compensate. Also, in achieving my geometry, things ultimately would have gone a lot faster with a master jig.

Finally, I wish I had tested my chain stay design on the instron. I was so preoccupied with carbon fiber that I never tested the way that I mated the plate steel to the tubing. Never fear, I’m planning on testing this retroactively. The results of the test will determine how I ride this bike.

Public reaction was mixed, as expected. No one cares about bikes, unless they already do. People who are into bikes pull me aside to talk about it. Mechanics look at it slack jawed. As for the general public, it really has to be shoved in their faces. They can appreciate the blued steel and carbon, but they have to be told where to look.

As for what I learned from the project, it seems almost futile to list. Everything. I learned setup, about brazing, thermal expansion, carbon layup, adhesive mechanics, steel chemistry, instron testing, bicycle tube fitment, machining, mold making, subcontracting, finishing and a bit of marketing. I also learned that the exorbitant price of custom bike frames should be higher.

My plan going forward is to build a fork in this style, master brazing and contract out custom carbon tubing. I think that in a couple years, with an engineer income, I’ll be able to do this better and faster. Probably knock a full pound off the frame weight.

 

Previous Post
Desktop Radial Engine: Reflection
Next Post
How Its Made: Desktop Radial Engine

5 Comments. Leave new

  • Albert Como
    Daniel Moody
    May 5, 2016 12:18 am

    The only remaining question is how long till the next one? I know I already want to build another frame. The geometry issue kind of stinks but it looks like the handling was still pretty good. Determining the geometry for me was a big headache as deciding what exactly what you want vs. what actually ride well is difficult. It definitely seems more art than science. Can you just order/use a different fork with a smaller crown to axle to compensate on your preload miscalculations a little bit?

    Nice job! I definitely think you win for most involved. And arguably coolet!

    Reply
  • Albert Como
    Andre Szlendak
    May 2, 2016 7:06 pm

    I want to ride this really really bad. Tell me more about the characteristics and how it feels different from your other bikes. Do you think this has to do with the build/material/geometry?

    Reply
  • Albert Como
    Ethan Gehring
    May 2, 2016 11:30 am

    This bike came out really good. What do you plan on doing if you find out the chain stay is weaker than expected? It seems like you were able to learn a lot of manufacturing techniques that we are often told about in classes but don’t get the chance to implement such as brazing and working with carbon fiber. It seems that, like a lot of the class projects, round two will create something exceptional.

    Reply
  • Such a sweet project. Glad it all worked out, knowing how hard you suffered on it at times. Keep it up

    Reply
  • Albert Como
    Sreyas Krishnan
    April 28, 2016 3:17 pm

    The final product here, in my opinion, is exceptional. I always tell people how crazy it is that someone from school basically built a robust bike frame from scratch. However, as nice as the product is, the processes and procedures you’ve learned during this project will carry you even further. I really hope that you continue to put in more of your own time outside of school into these types of projects. Even if your big ticket doesn’t turn out to be a bike frame, there’s something out there that’ll catch on. Just you have to keep going strong! Congrats Bert.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Menu